New Video Suggests Chiefs Got A Free 1st Down On Game-Tying Drive, Sparking Claims of Super Bowl 58 Rigging Among NFL Fans

Conspiracy theorists have something eIse to latch onto after the Kansas City Chiefs won the Super Bowl. Late in the fourth quarter, Patrick Mahomes and the Chiefs offense were matriculating the ball down the field in an effort to win or tie the game.

One pIay showed Mahomes scrambling out of the pocket for minimal yards on first down, clearly not enough for a fresh set of downs.

One video posted by fans showed that the play ended up being a first down even though he never made it that far.On a game-changing pIay, Mahomes hit Travis Kelce for 22 yards on third-and-7 to drive the Chiefs deep into 49ers territory.On a game-changing play, Mahomes hit Travis Kelce for 22 yards on third-and-7 to drive the Chiefs deep into 49ers territory.

Harrison Butker would eventually be called on to make the score 19-19 with three seconds left in the fourth quarter as the 49ers would kneel and the game would head into overtime.

Mahomes’ legend continues to grow, as his overtime drive Ied to a Super Bowl LVIII win over the San Francisco 49ers, 25-22, on Sunday night in Las Vegas. The Chiefs defended their Super Bowl title, winning back-to-back Vince Lombardi Trophies and collecting their third ring in the past five seasons.

Mahomes finished the game with 333 yards on 34-for-46 through the air with two touchdowns and one interception, while rushing for a team-high 66 yards on nine carries.

15 Famous People of the Past Whose Depictions Prove That Photoshop Existed, Even in the Nineteenth Century

Photo editing programs have long been a part of our lives, so you can rarely see a photo that hasn’t been retouched. However, it’s wrong to think that Photoshop belongs only to the modern world. People have been improving the looks of their portraits for centuries. That means there were specialists in photo retouching that date all the way back to the nineteenth century. Even painters have worked hard to make models look more beautiful than they really were.

At Bright Side, we searched the archives and found photos of royalty from the nineteenth century and the beginning of the twentieth century, and we compared them to their portrait paintings. At the end of the article, we’ll show you what Vincent van Gogh really looked like.

Isabella II of Spain (1830 â€” 1904)

Mary of Teck, the spouse of George V (1867 â€” 1953)

Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon, the mother of Queen Elizabeth II (1900 â€” 2002)

Princess Helena of the United Kingdom (1846 â€” 1923)

Victoria, Princess Royal, German Empress (1840 â€” 1901)

Charlotte of Belgium (1840 â€” 1927)

Sophie of WĂźrttemberg, Queen of the Netherlands (1818 â€” 1877)

Queen Victoria (1819 â€” 1901)

Maria Christina of Austria, Queen-consort of Spain (1858 â€” 1929)

Maria Luisa of Bourbon-Parma, Princess-consort of Bulgaria (1870 â€” 1899)

Grand Duchess Elena Vladimirovna of Russia (1882 â€” 1957)

Princess Beatrice of the United Kingdom, Queen Victoria’s fifth daughter (1857 â€” 1944)

Alexandra Feodorovna, the spouse of Nicholas II of Russia (1872 â€” 1918)

Princess Alice of Battenberg, the mother-in-law of Queen Elizabeth II (1885 â€” 1969)

Alexandra of Denmark, the spouse of Edward VII (1844 â€” 1925)

onus: Vincent van Gogh (1853 â€” 1890)

What do you think about Photoshop? Do you use it often? Tell us in the comments below.

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*