So I am at Walmart scanning and bagging my almost $300 worth of groceries while the employee that wants $15 an hour “monitors” and then this happened.
Her – why are you double bagging all of your groceries?
Me – excuse me?
Her – you are wasting our bags!
Me – if you don’t likе the way I’m bagging the groceries, feel free to come on over here and bag them yourself.
Her – that’s not my job!
Me – okay, then I will bag my groceries how I please if that’s all right with you.
Her – why are you using two bags?!
Me – because the bags are weak and I don’t want the handles to break or the bottoms to rip out.
Her – well that’s because you are putting too much stuff in the bag. If you took half of that stuff out and put it in a different bag then you wouldn’t need to double bag.
*10 seconds of me just staring at her.
Me – so you want me to split these items in half and put half of them in a different bag so that I don’t have to double bag.
Her – exactly.
Me – so I would still be using two bags to hold the same number of items.
Her – no because you wouldn’t be double bagging.
*me pressing two fingers to my left eye in an attempt to make it stop twitching.
Me – okay so here I have a jug of milk and a bottle of juice double bagged. If I take the milk out and remove the double bagging and just put the milk in the single bag and the juice in that single bag I’m still using two bags for these two items.
Her- no because you are not double bagging them so it’s not the same number of bags.
*me looking around at about 10 other customers who at this point are enjoying the show.
Me- is this likе that Common Core math stuff I keep hearing about?
Her- never mind you just don’t get it.
And with that, she went back to her little Podium so she could continue texting or playing games on her phone or whatever it was she was doing before she decided to come over and critique my bagging skiIIs.
3 Incredible Stories Where Money Caused a Rift in the Family
These stories reveal how money’s presence can bring both hidden motives and deep-seated grievances to light, as well as its potential to heal and transform relationships—when handled with care.
In the first story, Marcus’s stepmother’s plan to monopolize his father’s support and push him out almost succeeded until his grandmother intervened with a powerful revelation. Karen’s true colors emerged as she manipulated the situation for control and self-interest, showing that her actions were less about Marcus’s “responsibility” and more about power. Marcus’s ownership of the home shifted the power dynamics and allowed him to reclaim a sense of belonging and trust with his father.
The second tale highlights how old family wounds can fester without honest confrontation. The siblings’ unresolved bitterness and strained family ties underscore how inheritance can magnify existing issues if not approached with mutual respect. Grandma Eleanor’s strategy of using inheritance as a means to push for reconciliation adds a glimmer of hope that even the most fractured relationships might mend, but it will take more than money. Eleanor’s words subtly nudge the family to realize that true inheritance isn’t just financial; it’s the legacy of love and unity they could carry forward if they can heal.
These narratives show that while money can reveal the darkest parts of human nature, it can also be a catalyst for positive change, serving as a reminder that wealth alone is never enough to mend broken trust or create genuine connections. The choices people make in these situations reveal what truly drives them: power, control, or a desire for healing.
Leave a Reply