Given how long Sajak and White have worked together, many viewers have wondered over the years whether or not the pair was ever romantically involved. It’s a question that White finally answered. Here’s a brief history of the hosts’ time on the show and their unique relationship.
Joining ‘Wheel of Fortune’
Pat Sajak joined Wheel of Fortune in December of 1981. A year later, Vanna White was also made part of the cast. She made it to the final round of casting over more than 200 other women who hoped to become the future letter flipper. Ultimately, White won out over Summer Bartholomew and Vicki McCarty, the other top choices for the role of hostess.
After testing each of the women on real episodes of the show, the producer decided that White was the one who activated the letters best of all the candidates. She quickly became very popular among viewers, particularly young adults. Many of her fans were interested in her dazzling show wardrobe. The phenomenon, known as “Vannamania,” swept through the United States, earning the new star numerous additional jobs outside of Wheel of Fortune.
Nearly 40 years together
For the next 40 years, White and Sajak would work intimately together as host and hostess of Wheel of Fortune. While they generally stuck to the same roles throughout this time, there were a few instances where they would swap, most notably in November 1996 when Sajak had laryngitis.
Despite their many years together, in 2020 Sajak admitted that he initially didn’t want White to be cast as the hostess. He said, “Not that she wasn’t lovely and wonderful and personable and all that. But she was the most nervous, by far, of any of them.”
White obviously proved him wrong and has done a wonderful job. It helped that the pair seems to have such incredible chemistry together. It’s this very chemistry which has caused many fans to question just what kind of relationship White and Sajak had outside of filming.
Friends or more?
It is well known that White and Sajak get along well – extremely well, in fact. According to White herself, they rarely disagree on anything except whether ketchup should be put on a hot dog. Yet despite their closeness, White has emphasized that they really are just best friends and there is nothing romantic going on between them. The closest the two have come to being involved was when they played a prank on their audience.
“Years and years ago, we did an April Fool’s joke,” White recalled. “I don’t know that we said we were married, but we said something about being together, and we received toasters…” Sajak added later that it took years for people to stop sending the “married couple” Crockpots.
So although the renowned Wheel of Fortune stars have been together, in a work sense, for longer than most couples, they are not, and have never been, in a romantic relationship.
Nearly 20 years without a raise?
Soon after Sajak announced his retirement, fans were stunned to learn that Vanna White has not gotten a pay raise in 18 years. This surprising revelation comes from Puck reporter Matthew Belloni, who says that White, 66, has hired an aggressive lawyer to negotiate a raise as her current deal concludes at the end of the 2023-24 season.
Puck’s report states that White currently earns $3 million annually, while Sajak earns five times more than that. While some argue that Sajak is the host while White is a co-host responsible only for revealing letters on the board, Puck asserts that White engages in significantly more publicity for the show than Sajak. Sony, the show’s production company, declined to comment on Puck’s findings.
Whoopi Goldberg from The View expressed interest in taking over Sajak’s role, and several other notable names, including Ryan Seacrest and Sajak’s daughter Maggie, were mentioned as potential candidates.
Seacrest was named the new host of ‘Wheel’
The New York Times and other media outlets reported on June 27 that Ryan Seacrest will take over as the host of Wheel of Fortune. The news comes just two weeks after Sajak’s announcement. Seacrest, 48, is a talk show veteran himself, having hosted and produced many other programs including American Idol and Live with Kelly and Ryan.
“I’m truly humbled to be stepping into the footsteps of the legendary Pat Sajak,” Seacrest said in a statement. “I can say, along with the rest of America, that it’s been a privilege and pure joy to watch Pat and Vanna on our television screens for an unprecedented 40 years, making us smile every night and feel right at home with them.”
Seacrest will also act as a consulting producer on the show.
Jim Caviezel Makes a Protest and Says It Would Be “Awful and Ungodly” to Work with Robert De Niro
Actor Jim Caviezel rose to fame after calling renowned actor Robert De Niro a “awful, ungodly man” and refusing to work with him. This unusual attitude in Hollywood has generated conversations about how to balance one’s personal values with one’s commercial ties.
This article explores the specifics of Caviezel’s bold decision, the reasons he declined to collaborate with De Niro, and the broader effects of his open comments in the film industry. Jim Caviezel is well known for his steadfast moral principles and firm Christian convictions. His portrayal of Jesus Christ in Mel Gibson’s “The Passion of the Christ” is what made him most famous.
On the other hand, the well-known actor Robert De Niro is commended for his versatility in acting and his candid opinions on a broad spectrum of social and political issues. Caviezel’s reluctance to collaborate with De Niro brings to light the conflict between a person’s moral convictions and the teamwork required in filmmaking.
In a recent interview, Caviezel was questioned on potential collaborations with De Niro. With considerable conviction, he declared, “I won’t work with Robert De Niro.” He is a terrible, immoral person.
The strong language in his message immediately caught the interest of fans and the media, generating questions about the specifics of the alleged falling out between the two celebrities. Throughout the meeting, Caviezel stayed silent on specifics, but it’s obvious that his decision was influenced by a deep moral battle.
Given De Niro’s ardent Christian beliefs and commitment to businesses that uphold his moral values, Caviezel appears to believe that there is a distinction between the man on the outside and his past actions.
Due to Caviezel’s ambiguous comment, there were speculations and a rise in public interest in the underlying dynamics. Entertainers often share their opinions on a variety of subjects, such as why they have chosen not to collaborate with a certain individual.
However, opinions on Caviezel’s bold statement have been mixed. Some commend him for sticking to his convictions, considering it an exceptional example of integrity in a field that is occasionally chastised for its lack of morality. Publicly making such statements, according to others, is a bad idea because it can limit one’s prospects for a future career and perpetuate divisions within the profession.
The fact that Caviezel turned down working with De Niro begs further concerns about how actors navigate their personal beliefs in the sometimes contentious, cooperative environment of Hollywood. Although many perspectives and expressions have historically benefited the industry, there is an increasing tendency of artists placing restrictions on their work according to their personal convictions.
This episode serves as an example of how Hollywood is evolving and how people are willing to uphold their principles even at the expense of their professional opportunities. In the entertainment industry, there have been cases where an actor’s public comments have benefited or hindered their career. Some who share Caviezel’s unwavering commitment to his beliefs may find it poignant that he turned down the opportunity to work with De Niro.
Leave a Reply