The hit 1972 sitcom “M*A*S*H” introduced the world to a number of memorable and beloved characters, from the smart-mouthed yet compassionate Captain Benjamin Franklin “Hawkeye” Pierce to his endearing friend, Captain B.J. Hunnicutt. Almost every character had stuck in the minds of the fans.
One of the characters that often featured but was easily overlooked by his military counterparts due to his nervous nature was the 4077 MASH unit’s company clerk, Corporal Walter Eugene “Radar” O’Reilly. Although many of the staff on the base tended to take Radar’s effort for granted, the fans sure noticed him.
Radar was portrayed by the acclaimed actor Gary Burghoff from the start of the TV show in 1972 until the seventh season, which aired in 1979. Although fans clamored for more of the unassuming clerk, Burghoff revealed that he needed to step away from the show to rekindle his personal relationships and fight burnout.
“M*A*S*H’s” Influence and Burghoff’s Personal Identity
Although Burghoff enjoyed playing Radar, the role became increasingly demanding. The actor commented that it became difficult to separate himself from his character in the eyes of the public, which soon became tedious. He also noted that he despised being fawned over by the crowds:
“Aw, I know I’m cute. Cute, cute, CUTE! I was always cute because I was always the smallest kid on the block. I hate cute.”
Everyone saw Burghoff as an adorable, short, timid character as they’d known him on-screen and on the stage for many years. However, after years of being looked down upon, both metaphorically and physically speaking, Burghoff grew tired of the persona so easily attributed to him by scores of people he had never even met.
The actor lashed out against this view of him as a cute little fellow by defending his height. As he so rightly pointed out, 5 feet 6 inches isn’t irregularly short, and he would have seen the tops of Arte Johnson or Mickey Rooney’s heads had they ever met. Nonetheless, the persona stuck.
Luckily for all his fans, Burghoff didn’t let his disability stand in his way, and he pursued his dream of becoming an actor.
Despite his misgivings about how others perceived him, Burghoff’s fellow cast members adored him. The director Charles Dubin recalled working with Burghoff before he left “M*A*S*H,” noting how caring and pleasant Burghoff was to everyone on set. However, Burghoff had another aspect of himself that drove down his self-esteem.
Burghoff had been born with a congenital disability called Brachydactyly, a form of Poland Syndrome. The condition left the actor with three fingers on his left hand that were noticeably smaller than the rest of his digits, and the abnormality had plagued him since he was a small child. The actor commented:
“Of course, this defect affected me while I was growing up. I suppose when I was very young, I knew my disability would set me apart and make me special.”
Luckily for all his fans, Burghoff didn’t let his disability stand in his way, and he pursued his dream of becoming an actor. Yet, becoming a fan-favorite on one of the most iconic TV shows America had ever produced never managed to quell his insecurities about his stout fingers and stocky frame.
Throughout his run on “M*A*S*H,” Burghoff tried to hide his left hand from the camera. He would often position himself so that the camera could only see one side of his body and usually gestured with his right if the scene required it, although the actor would be obligated to use both hands now and again.
In one of the earliest episodes, viewers were introduced to Radar as he stood in an open area, wearing a greyish shirt and his trademark cap. As the actor turned around and looked at the sky — once again hearing approaching helicopters before everyone else — the camera briefly panned over both his hands holding a football.
When Colonel Sherman T. Potter first made his appearance on the show, taking over from the beloved Lieutenant Colonel Henry Blake, Radar and the new commander shared a scene where they first met. As Colonel Potter exited the room to find the latrines, the camera centered on Burghoff’s upper body as he opened a box with both hands.
Another infamous scene caught Burghoff with both hands on camera. During a regular morning salute, with the loathsome Major Frank Burns leading the ceremony, Radar does his usual morning salute with a bugle. In a hilarious twist, one of the men fires off the ceremonial canon at Burns’s behest.
Naturally, Radar gets the short end of the stick as the cannonball flies directly at him, knocking his instrument clean out of his hands. In the next few seconds, Burghoff turns toward the camera in a pantomime of rage, balling his fists and stomping in outrage. Here, both his hands can be seen for a brief second.
In one of the later episodes, the writers showed off Radar’s softer side when he cuddled his pet guinea pig, Babette. Naturally, Radar stood with his left hand beneath his right, but just as he started to sing, Father John Mulcahy called for him. Burghoff’s hands were visible again as he put the Babette away.
One of the scenes where Burghoff openly showed his left hand came as part of another gag the show pulled. At the start of the scene, Radar could be seen walking across a dirt road while two other military personnel walked away from the camera. The man on Radar’s right first lifted his hand in salute, followed shortly by one on the left.
Radar, the pleasant character he was, lifted his right hand in response to the first salute, as military etiquette dictates. Caught off guard by the quick second salute, Radar lifted his left hand as well, essentially performing a double salute. Feeling sheepish, he frowned and lowered his hands slowly in one of Burghoff’s classic displays of confusion.
She Destroyed Our $3000 Wedding Cake and Paid Dearly
When a $3000 wedding cake and a meddling mother-in-law collide, chaos is inevitable. Today, we explore a story of family conflict, revenge, and the aftermath of hasty decisions. Sarah, the bride, shares her experience of how a ruined cake led to a major showdown on her big day. This tale raises the question: is seeking revenge ever justified in such situations? Let’s break down this sugary disaster and uncover the lessons about family dynamics, forgiveness, and the emotional intensity weddings can bring.
Thank you for opening up about your wedding day troubles. Your tale of revenge against your mother-in-law has sparked intense reactions and brings up some important considerations about family, forgiveness, and what we do when we feel wronged. Let’s dive into your experience and explore the situation from different angles.
A Wedding Day Disaster
Sarah, what was supposed to be a celebration of love turned into a battlefield of emotions and retaliation. Your custom wedding cake wasn’t just a beautiful centerpiece; it was a symbol of your special day. The destruction of that cake was a heartless and inconsiderate act that understandably caused you a lot of pain. Naturally, your anger and need for justice made sense, but the path you chose only seemed to increase the tension and hurt.
Let’s look more closely at what happened and consider how things might have gone differently.
The Cake Sabotage: The Emotional Toll
The loss of your $3000 cake wasn’t just a financial hit—it symbolized a deeper attack on something precious. When your mother-in-law took part in ruining the cake and gleefully snapping photos with her friends, it was a blatant disregard for your feelings and the significance of your wedding. Watching them laugh as they destroyed something so meaningful was no doubt a painful experience.
It’s natural to feel upset, betrayed, and a desire for justice when faced with such cruelty. However, reacting to these powerful emotions doesn’t always result in a positive outcome.
Revenge: A Short-Term Solution with Long-Term Impact
Out of frustration and hurt, you made the decision to retaliate by tampering with your mother-in-law’s outfit. At that moment, it probably felt like payback to see her humiliated just as she had humiliated you. However, this act of revenge only escalated the situation, creating new problems instead of resolving the old ones.
By lowering yourself to her level, you gave her the opportunity to flip the narrative and play the victim, which may have strained your relationship with your husband. It’s always important to think about how our actions can have lasting effects, especially when it comes to family.
Breaking the Cycle: Choosing Dialogue Over Drama
Although your mother-in-law’s actions were unacceptable, there may have been more productive ways to handle the situation. Even though direct communication can be difficult, it often brings better results than silent retaliation. Imagine if you had approached her before the wedding to calmly express your hurt and disappointment.
That conversation could have opened the door for her to apologize or, at the very least, understand how her actions affected you. Taking the higher road would have allowed you to maintain your dignity while possibly improving the relationship in the long run.
The Ripple Effect: How It Affects the Whole Family
Your husband’s reaction to your revenge highlights an essential point—your actions didn’t just affect your mother-in-law. The fallout from your retaliation had a wider impact on your family, casting a shadow over what should have been a joyful occasion.
Consider how your wedding guests, especially those who didn’t know about the cake drama, might have felt witnessing the tension and awkwardness. By seeking justice for yourself, you may have unintentionally made things uncomfortable for others.
Moving On: Healing and Restoring Peace
Sarah, while what happened on your wedding day cannot be changed, there’s still a chance to mend the situation. Start by having an open and honest conversation with your husband about how you felt and why you acted the way you did. Admitting that your reaction was driven by pain can be the first step toward healing.
It could also be helpful to sit down with your mother-in-law for a candid discussion. Allowing both sides to voice their grievances might pave the way for forgiveness and peace. Remember, you’re now part of the same family, and finding common ground will be key to a happier future.
Takeaways: Growth, Communication, and Rebuilding
While your mother-in-law’s behavior was undoubtedly cruel, your response only added to the damage. This experience can teach important lessons about communication, the pitfalls of revenge, and the intricate relationships within families. Going forward, focus on healing, forgiveness, and building better, more respectful connections with your new family members.
In the end, how we respond to others’ bad behavior says a lot about us. It’s not too late to turn this story around and lay the groundwork for a stronger, healthier family dynamic in your married life.
After the cake fiasco, all we could think about was how a Hollywood wedding would have gone. Join us next as we dive into 30 of the most stunning wedding dresses ever seen in movies!
Leave a Reply