A happy mom recently told the story of how her little girl said goodbye to a birthmark on her forehead, even though they initially faced some criticism from doctors.
A very uncommon birthmark.
© viennarosebrookshaw / Instagram, © viennarosebrookshaw / Instagram, © viennarosebrookshaw / Instagram
Here’s the story of Celine Casey and her two-year-old daughter, Vienna Shaw. Vienna was born with a rare birthmark called congenital melanocytic nevus (CMN) on her forehead, which only occurs in one out of every 20,000 newborns.
When Celine learned about the birthmark, she felt worried and wondered if she had done something wrong during her pregnancy. She didn’t know what the birthmark would mean for Vienna but was determined to remove it so that her daughter could grow up without feeling different.
© viennarosebrookshaw / Instagram
Even though the birthmark didn’t affect Brookshaw’s physical health, Casey knew it could impact her daughter’s mental well-being as she grew older and interacted with other children who might be curious about her condition.
Celine shared that the family sometimes used to hide Vienna’s birthmark by covering her face when they went out. She said, “We went out daily with her and got a few stares.”
The surgery was challenging.
© viennarosebrookshaw / Instagram
When they sought help from the NHS, the family received disheartening feedback. Doctors couldn’t go ahead with the surgery to remove the birthmark, categorizing it as a cosmetic procedure.
However, the parents viewed it differently. They were genuinely worried about potential teasing from other kids, which could affect their daughter’s mental well-being at a young age. Casey was also concerned that if they didn’t remove the birthmark, her daughter might grow to resent her and her partner.
© viennarosebrookshaw / Instagram, © viennarosebrookshaw / Instagram, © viennarosebrookshaw / Instagram
The parents took matters into their own hands and privately raised the required funds. Through crowdfunding, they managed to gather $52,000 within 24 hours. However, due to increased hospital costs in 2020, they had to raise an additional $27,000. With a new funding request, they eventually reached their goal.
They encountered difficulties with doctors.
© viennarosebrookshaw / Instagram
Disagreements between the medical team and the parents have led to differing opinions. Vienna’s parents wanted the birthmark removed through surgery, but the surgeon refused to perform the procedure. The surgeon’s stance is rooted in the belief that the child should make the decision once she reaches an appropriate age.
After this controversy arose, Daniel Brookshaw, Vienna’s father, expressed his dissatisfaction with the doctor’s viewpoint. The doctor also consulted with a dermatologist who concurred with the surgeon, emphasizing that the birthmark doesn’t threaten Vienna’s health and is not cancerous.
The surgery was completed successfully.
© viennarosebrookshaw / Instagram
Vienna is now two years old, and her doctors have successfully removed her birthmark, leaving only a faint scar between her eyebrows. Casey regularly shares updates on Shaw’s scar and recovery process on her social media, and followers often comment on how beautiful her little girl looks.
Despite the birthmark being gone, Casey mentioned that they still have to travel between cities to check the healing of the scar and see if any additional procedures are needed beyond the three she has already undergone. Shaw is now enjoying the typical life of a two-year-old.
© viennarosebrookshaw / Instagram
This little girl’s case with her birthmark brings attention to the delicate balance between parental advocacy and a child’s autonomy in medical decisions. While her parents aimed to secure her social acceptance and well-being, medical professionals stressed the importance of respecting Vienna’s future autonomy over her own body.
This story serves as a reminder of the intricate ethical considerations that arise when navigating the boundaries of parental authority and individual autonomy, prompting broader reflections on the rights of minors in the medical realm.
Barbra Streisand Defends District Attorney Fani Willis: “A Woman Can Have a Private Life”
Conservative critics have been criticizing Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis, and Barbra Streisand has lately come out in favor of her. Streisand is adamant that the critiques of Willis are an unjustified attempt to damage her reputation by intruding into her private affairs.
Streisand outlined in a post on X how Willis is being unfairly scrutinized for her personal connection to Nathan Wade, a deputy attorney she employed to look into the Georgia 2020 election results. Streisand emphasized the unfair disparities that exist, posing the question of why it is acceptable for males to lead private lives yet women are subjected to harsh criticism for doing the same.
“How absurd it is for the Republicans to want to fire Fani Willis. For what purpose? Believing that a woman cannot lead a private life in addition to a career? Men engage in it frequently! How absurd is this situation? Streisand said.
Not content to stop there, Streisand also used the occasion to attack former President Trump and his allies. She emphasized that the attacks on Willis are a ploy to divert attention away from the most important details of the case, which include Trump’s purported attempt to exert pressure on the Secretary of State to rig the vote tallies in his favor and submit fictitious electors to Congress.
This ongoing dispute highlights the larger discussion of how personal and professional lives overlap, particularly when it comes to high-stakes legal and political disputes. It raises important concerns about gender equality and the particular demands made on women in leadership roles.
Barbra Streisand’s support of Fani Willis highlights the particular difficulties women have in juggling their personal and professional obligations. It serves as a heartbreaking reminder that women’s decisions to retain a private life in addition to their work obligations should not be scrutinized or judged.
In conclusion, Streisand’s remarks highlight the significance of treating all people fairly in the workplace, regardless of gender. Like men, women should be allowed to lead their lives without being subjected to unwarranted criticism. It’s a request that everyone acknowledge and deal with these prejudices in order to establish a more equal and encouraging work environment for everyone.
Leave a Reply