What number should replace the question mark

Cognitive puzzles have always intrigued and challenged our minds, pushing us to think outside the box. Today, we have an interesting brain teaser featuring fried eggs with an unknown number in one corner. The big question is: What number should replace the question mark?

At first glance, this puzzle might seem straightforward, but many people struggle to find the correct answer. Let’s break it down step by step, analyze common mistakes, and finally arrive at the right solution.

Try to Solve It First!

Before we dive into the solution, take a moment to analyze the image. Each fried egg pair or grouping has a number next to it, except for the last one. Your challenge is to figure out the pattern behind these numbers and determine the missing value.

So, what’s your answer? 12? 24? Something else? Let’s see if you’re right.

Common Mistakes People Make

Puzzles like this often trick people into seeing patterns that don’t actually exist or missing key details. Here are some common mistakes:

  1. Assuming the numbers represent the total number of yolks
    Many people assume the number is simply the count of yolks in each grouping. However, if that were the case, the values would be 2, 3, 2, and 3—this doesn’t match the numbers given.
  2. Thinking the numbers count the number of egg whites
    Some might assume the numbers are based on the number of egg whites. However, we see cases where eggs are overlapping, making this unreliable.
  3. Overcomplicating the pattern
    Some puzzle solvers jump straight to complex mathematical operations before checking simpler patterns.

If you made one of these mistakes—don’t worry! Now let’s walk through the correct method to solve this.

Video : Which Number Replaces The Question Mark ??

Step-by-Step Solution: Finding the Pattern

Let’s examine the numbers given: 12, 23, and 22. Each number corresponds to a different grouping of eggs. But what do they mean?

Step 1: Count the Yolk Pairs and Their Positioning

Looking closely at each plate, we see that:

  • 12 → Two yolks in one egg white.
  • 23 → Three yolks in one egg white + two yolks in another egg white.
  • 22 → Two yolks in each of two egg whites.

From this, we see that the numbers are NOT just counting yolks or egg whites alone.

Step 2: Understanding the Number Formation

Observing the pattern, the first digit of the number corresponds to the number of yolks in the first egg, and the second digit corresponds to the number of yolks in the second egg.

  • 12 → (1 yolk in the first egg, 2 yolks in the second egg)
  • 23 → (2 yolks in the first egg, 3 yolks in the second egg)
  • 22 → (2 yolks in the first egg, 2 yolks in the second egg)

Step 3: Identifying the Last Number

Now, let’s apply this pattern to the final grouping, which contains 3 yolks in one egg white and no additional egg.

Following the same rule, the first digit is 3 (yolks in the first egg), and since there is no second egg, we assume the second digit is 1.

Thus, the missing number should be 13.

Final Answer: 13

After carefully analyzing the pattern, we conclude that the correct number to replace the question mark is 13. The first digit represents the number of yolks in the first egg, and the second digit represents the number of yolks in the second egg.

Did you get it right? If not, don’t worry! The key takeaway is to pay attention to patterns rather than just counting random elements.

Video : Egg Riddles

Join the Discussion!

Did you find a different pattern? Do you enjoy solving logic puzzles like this one? Share your answers and thoughts in the comments below!

If you liked this challenge, try tackling more puzzles to sharpen your logical thinking and pattern recognition skills. The more you practice, the better you get at spotting hidden patterns and solving tricky problems quickly.

So, what are you waiting for? Test your brain with another puzzle today!

I Want My Jobless Mom, 64, to Babysit My Kid but She Demands Payment

Natalie, a new mom with a demanding job, found herself in need of assistance and turned to her mother, Diane, for help in caring for her baby. Diane, a loving and supportive presence, readily embraced the responsibility.

As days turned into weeks, Diane’s contribution became indispensable, but a subtle tension arose when she broached the topic of compensation. Recognizing the increased demands on her time and the financial strain, Diane delicately expressed her need for financial support.

Caught off guard, Natalie grappled with the idea of compensating her mother for the help she provided. Seeking advice from an online community, she received varied perspectives on the intersection of family support and monetary remuneration.

The discussions highlighted the complexities of familial dynamics, with some advocating for compensation as recognition of the significant commitment involved in caregiving. Others emphasized the unconditional support of family, transcending financial exchanges.

In reflecting on the discourse, Natalie realized that while monetary compensation was one form of appreciation, the true value lay in the bond between mother and daughter. Choosing to express her gratitude through heartfelt gestures, Natalie aimed to honor the immeasurable support her mother provided during a critical time, bridging the gap with gestures that transcended mere financial transactions.

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*