According to science this 43-year-old model has the perfect body! But wait till she turns… 😮 More photos in the comments 👇🏻

Surprising Scientific Study Challenges Conventional Beauty Standards

Science often confirms what we already know, but occasionally, it surprises us with new findings that challenge conventional beliefs. A recent scientific study has raised eyebrows by suggesting that a 43-year-old model may possess the ‘ideal figure.’ In this article, we delve into the study’s revelations and explore the evolving standards of beauty.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CF-pDdYnJwC/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=f3ebd9c6-8e70-487d-97de-78d86858a53a

The Ever-Changing Ideal Body Type

Traditionally, the fashion industry has favored extremely slim body types, epitomized by iconic models like Kate Moss. Marilyn Monroe’s voluptuous figure, once admired, has been replaced by the preference for an hourglass shape. However, a groundbreaking study from Texas University has questioned this longstanding notion.

Embracing Fuller and Curvier Figures

The study indicates that a ‘fuller’ and ‘curvier’ body type is preferred among women. The ideal body mass index (BMI) is identified as 18.85, with specific measurements for bust size, waist, and hips. Interestingly, these specifications closely align with those of British model Kelly Brook, whose appearance challenges today’s beauty standards.

Kelly Brook/Instagram

Beauty Lies in the Eye of the Beholder

It is crucial to acknowledge that attractiveness is subjective, and people have diverse aesthetic preferences. While the study identifies an ‘ideal’ body type based on scientific data, it does not invalidate other body shapes as unacceptable or unattractive. It merely challenges the conventional notion that thinness is the sole measure of beauty.

Celebrating Diversity in Beauty

Recognizing the variance in perceptions of attractiveness is particularly relevant in contemporary society, which increasingly values diversity. The modeling industry has gradually embraced plus-size models, exemplified by trailblazers like Ashley Graham. Such inclusivity highlights that all body types can be stunning and should be celebrated.

The scientific study challenging conventional beauty standards sparks thought-provoking discussions about attractiveness and societal norms. While it identifies an ‘ideal’ body type, it does not diminish the beauty of other forms. Embracing diversity in beauty empowers individuals to appreciate their uniqueness and promotes a more inclusive perspective on attractiveness. As we continue to evolve, let us celebrate the myriad ways beauty manifests itself in our world.

https://www.instagram.com/p/CBgTBJdDRG2/?utm_source=ig_embed&ig_rid=64dd065e-8264-4df6-936f-38939c54bed0

What are your views on the study’s conclusions and the evolving standards of beauty? Join the conversation and share your opinions in the comments section. Let your friends and family participate in this thought-provoking discussion!

You Won’t Believe What Happened When This Woman with Facial Tattoos Went to TJ Maxx!

Sometimes, when you apply for a job and don’t get it, you might wonder why. Was it your skills, how you presented yourself, or something else?

Ash Putnam, who is 23 years old and covered in tattoos, recently shared her frustration on TikTok after being turned down for a job at TJ Maxx.

Her video became really popular, with over seven million views and tens of thousands of comments. Many people agreed with her about how hard it can be for young people to find entry-level jobs.

Putnam explained on TikTok that she applied for a job at TJ Maxx and later got an email saying she didn’t get the job. She felt disappointed that they didn’t even call her personally, just sent an automatic email.

Not satisfied with the response, she went to the store and asked the employees why she didn’t get hired.

“I went in today and asked, ‘Why didn’t I get hired?’ The employee said, ‘You don’t have enough experience. There were other candidates with more experience.’”

Putnam also asked if her tattoos were the reason she didn’t get the job. Many places don’t like employees with visible tattoos. The employee said that wasn’t the reason, but Putnam wasn’t sure she believed that.

“Just because I have tattoos doesn’t mean I won’t be a good worker. I don’t understand that at all,” she said. “Some of the smartest people I know have tattoos and piercings.”

Her story sparked a lot of discussion about job hunting and how people are judged based on their appearance.

Even though the woman from California, who also works for Uber Eats, didn’t get a clear reason from TJ Maxx, many people on TikTok think they know why she was turned down.

One person said, “I’m a tattoo artist, it’s probably because of the tattoos.”

Another person, who works in human resources, commented, “No company would want someone with visible tattoos dealing with customers, like TJ Maxx.”

A former TJ Maxx employee added, “I used to work there, and they hire almost anyone off the street. It’s definitely because of the tattoos and piercings.”

Someone else suggested, “It might not be that you have tattoos, but maybe where the tattoos are located.”

These comments show that many think her tattoos could be the reason TJ Maxx didn’t hire her.

“I really think it’s because of my tattoos, as many comments say my tattoos are scary and demonic to some people,” she shared with the Daily Star.

She added, “TJ Maxx didn’t tell me this directly, but many comments on my TikTok are really mean. People say I should work at a circus or Halloween store.”

Even if her tattoos are why TJ Maxx didn’t hire her, she thinks companies should change how they hire people.

“If they think tattoos decide how good you are at a job, they need to think again. Tattoos, piercings, and colored hair aren’t unprofessional. They show creativity and being different. It’s 2024, people need to stop disliking tattoos.”

Do you think tattoos should decide if you get a job? Tell us on Facebook what you think.

Related Posts

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*